Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 11 Next »

Status (3 March 2021)

  • Data arrived by mail on 24 February 2021. Alex Buerkle has started processing the data to merged reads, and otu tables.

Demultiplexing and splitting

The directory for the raw sequence data (typically gz compressed; use run_pigz.sh and run_unpigz.sh to compress and decompress with multithreaded pigz, using SLURM) and the parsed and split reads is /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata. Files for individual samples will be in /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/sample_fastq/. In this case, rather than a pair of files, six files were delivered. Files that included R2 and R3 in the name were indexing reads that make no sense for our library constructs, so I have deleted them with rm WyomingPool_*_R[2-3]_*.fastq.gz. That leaves four files, which I have concatenated for the sake of simplicity.

cat WyomingPool_L2_S2_L002_R1_001.fastq WyomingPool_L1_S1_L001_R1_001.fastq > WyomingPool_novaseq4_R1.fastq

cat WyomingPool_L2_S2_L002_R4_001.fastq WyomingPool_L1_S1_L001_R4_001.fastq > WyomingPool_novaseq4_R2.fastq. (note that I renamed R4 to R2, because R2 is the typical label for the reverse reads).

Demultiplexing

The work is done by run_parse_count_onSplitInput.pl. As the name implies, we split the raw data into many files (240), so that the parsing can be done in parallel by many nodes. The approximate string matching that we are doing requires ~140 hours of CPU time, so we are splitting the task across many jobs. By doing so, the parsing takes less than one hour.

Splitting the compressed raw data was accomplished with the program split (done in an interactive SLURM job), with 16x106 lines (4x106 reads) being written to each file (with a remainder in the final file). These files were written to /gscratch and, as intermediate files that can be reconstructed readily, will not be retained long-term. Note that in a subsequent run, I used unpigz on the raw to send down pipe to split (see https://microcollaborative.atlassian.net/wiki/pages/resumedraft.action?draftId=1292926977).

mkdir -p /gscratch/buerkle/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata
cd /gscratch/buerkle/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata
unpigz --to-stdout /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/WyomingPool_novaseq4_R1.fastq | split -l 16000000 -d --suffix-length=3 --additional-suffix=.fastq - novaseq4_R1_ ;
unpigz --to-stdout /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/WyomingPool_novaseq4_R2.fastq | split -l 16000000 -d --suffix-length=3 --additional-suffix=.fastq - novaseq4_R2_

making 240 R1 files and 240 R2 files, with structured names (e.g., for the R1 set):

/gscratch/buerkle/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/novaseq4_R1_000.fastq
/gscratch/buerkle/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/novaseq4_R1_001.fastq
etc.

run_parse_count_onSplitInput.pl also writes to /gscratch.

NovaSeq4_Demux.csv was provided by Gregg Randolph. This file is used to map MIDS to sample names and projects.

Splitting to fastq for individuals

The info lines for each read in parsed_novaseq*_R1.fastq and parsed_novaseq*_R2.fastq have the locus, the forward mid, the reverse mid, and the sample name. These can be used with the demux key to separate reads into loci, projects, and samples, in the folder sample_fastq/. The reads are in separate files for each sequenced sample, including replicates. The unique combination of forward and reverse MIDs (for a locus) is part of the filename and allows replicates to be distinguished and subsequently merged.

run_splitFastq_fwd.sh and run_splitFastq_rev.sh run splitFastq_manyInputfiles.pl, which steps through the many pairs of files to split reads by sample and project, and place them in /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata/sample_fastq/.

splitFastq.pl and splitFastq_manyInputfiles.pl will need tweaking in the future, whenever sample names and the format of the key for demultiplexing and metadata changes. The number of columns has differed among some of early sequence lanes, which necessitated changes to this parsing script.

Calculate summary statistics on reads

In a sequence library’s rawdata/ directory (e.g., /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/rawdata) I made run_aggregate.sh, to run aggregate_usearch_fastx_info.pl with a slurm job.

Merge and filter reads

In /project/microbiome/data/seq/cu_24feb21novaseq4/tfmergedreads , we used run_slurm_mergereads.plto crawl the project folders and sample files (created in the splitting step above) to merge read pairs, and filter based on base quality. We are now not trimming primer regions. This is true even though we found with previous libraries that we could not readily eliminate low frequency, potentially spurious OTUs downstream by masking with vsearch; it would not properly mask these regions [by marking them with lower-case bases] and the soft mask them when we do vsearch cluster_size. This writes a new set of fasta files for each sample and project, rather than fastq, to be used in subsequent steps. These files are found in the 16S/ and ITS/ folders in tfmergedreads/.


This is where I am as of (steps above have been launched). Alex Buerkle will continue from here . The steps below have not yet been started; they contain notes for what I will do.


Statistics on the initial number reads, the number of reads that merged, and the number of reads that remain after filtering are in filtermergestats.csv in each project folder. For the full lane these summaries were concatenated in tfmergedreads/ with

cat */*/filtermergestats.csv > all_filtermergestats.csv

I used commands.R in that folder to make a plot of numbers of reads per sample (horizontal axis) and the number reads that were removed because they did not merge, or did meet quality criteria and were filtered out (vertical axis). Purple is for 16S and orange is for ITS. It might be interesting to do that plot for each of the projects in the library (TODO), and possibly to have marginal histograms (or put quantiles on the plots).

  • No labels