Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

A

NTC

NTC

NTC

PE1 A1

JC1 A1

PE1 A1

Take 2

JC1 A1

Take2

B

0.0002 pM Std

0.0002 pM Std

0.0002 pM Std

PE1 B1

JC1 B1

PE1 B1

Take 2

JC1 B1

Take 2

C

0.002 pM Std

0.002 pM Std

0.002 pM Std

PE1 C1

JC1 C1

PE1 C1

Take 2

JC1 C1

Take 2

D

0.02 pM Std

0.02 pM Std

0.02 pM Std

PE1 D1

JC1 D1

PE1 D1

Take 2

JC1 D1

Take 2

E

0.2 pM Std

0.2 pM Std

0.2 pM Std

PE1 E1

JC1 E1

PE1 E1

Take 2

JC1 E1

Take 2

F

2 pM Std

2 pM Std

2 pM Std

PE1 F1

JC1 F1

PE1 F1

Take 2

JC1 F1

Take 2

G

20 pM Std

20 pM Std

20 pM Std

PE1 G1

JC1 G1

PE1 G1

Take 2

JC1 G1

Take 2

H

PE1 H1

JC1 H1

PE1 H1

Take 2

JC1 H1

Take 2

Well, there is certainly a difference between the initial PCR2 and the redone version. There is a 100 fold increase in the redone version.

View file
nameNovaSeq2_PCR2redos.csv

We will repeat this one more time with the flow cell primers created anew from the 300 uM stock using one plate, PE1. We will also do a repeated PCR1 for this plate to include in the qPCR comparison.